|
Comments:
Anisettekiss - 2005-05-31 13:53:36
LOL! Dude does anyone care about Paris Hilton anymore!!???
-------------------------------
DanjerusKurves - 2005-05-31 13:59:30
Honest-to-godde, deep throating is seriously overrated. Most of the sensitivity and sensation are in the head anyway.
-------------------------------
betty - 2005-05-31 15:28:15
Deep throating makes me puke. Just saying.
-------------------------------
procrasto - 2005-05-31 16:54:15
Never experienced it.
Shallow throat maybe.
Maybe it's my own short comings.
Is that too much infomation?
-------------------------------
Jessica - 2005-05-31 17:28:57
Several items. 1. Paris is engaged to a man name Paris which to me sounds like some sort of egotistical circle jerk. 2. I certainly don't mind deep throating. 3. I think that guy is a tool for admitting it. I think he should have taken it to his grave so it stayed a big mystery. What an ass hat.
-------------------------------
Samantha - 2005-06-01 10:26:43
It's probably safe to assume none of you saw the C-Span special on ownership of the media last night. It was re-aired from it's original broadcast around the first of this month, and raised great points about commercial control of the media, and specifically the role of anonymous sources. If you're interested in freedom of speech (you know, so you can discuss Paris Hilton and stuff on blogs like this) you should be mindful of protecting the anonymous source. It was a brave thing Mr. Felt did - during the paranoid post-McCarthy 60's no less - to call out an American president for lying (timely, no?). And it was also brave of Felt's family to finally reveal his identity.
-------------------------------
Paris - 2005-06-01 11:24:18
What's C-Span?
-------------------------------
Kelly - 2005-06-01 11:39:56
I didnt see it. I was too busy blowing my boyfriend. That's hot.
-------------------------------
Samantha - 2005-06-01 12:09:03
Yeah, I'm hearing a lot now about the misuse (or more overuse) of the anonymous source which, according to most of the reporters addressing this subject lately, is usually a high-level government official speaking "off the record" or "on background." What reporters should be doing (which is what Woodward and Bernstein did with Watergate) is using these sources to trace documents and trails to the truth. More often, however, reporters are just after a good story that will "grab" their readers and don't bother to double check a story that fits that bill - much like the story Newsweek printed of the Koran being flushed down the toilet at Guantanamo that led to riots in the middle east. That story was based on the testimony of one unnamed source who later retracted it as heresay. That's irresponsible journalism for sure, but doesn't mean the anonymous source should be done away with. Stepping off my soap box now.
-------------------------------
Pandi - 2005-06-01 12:10:53
You kill me. "Take him to the zoo." You absolutely kill me. ;-)
-------------------------------
Samantha - 2005-06-01 12:12:41
My grandfather's name was Paris, my uncle's name is Paris, and so is my cousin's. Can I be in the club with the cool kids now?
-------------------------------
awittykitty - 2005-06-01 16:34:40
Oh Paris honey, C-Span is a secret code word for pre-nuptial agreement. Just remember that, ok?
-------------------------------
Paris, the boyfriend - 2005-06-02 10:44:01
What's a blow job?
-------------------------------
xquzme - 2005-06-02 10:48:12
Gumpity-gump-gump -- my comments DO work but the link is cleverly hidden in the upper left hand corner of the new LookitThePrettyColors template. I miss you! And, this just in: Paris and Paris are going to name their first born "Paris". Someone? Anyone? Has everyone gone completely batshit insane? Or just these two....
-------------------------------
add your comment:
back to the entry - Diaryland
|